GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10035/10081/1000/10068/100
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B0/10037/10085/10062/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$3.48/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
663K
281K
Completed sessions
1,452,897
6,728,677
Token share
0.85%
0.47%
Tokens
8.3T-76%
4.6T+678%
AUG 18OCT 12
AUG 18OCT 12
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.7%56K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.