Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Muse Spark 1.2Meta
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Muse Spark 1.2 | 0/100 | 40/100 | 34/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.25/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$4.25/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.9M
5K
Completed sessions
35,796,787
2,903
Token share
20.7%
0%
Tokens
202T+100%
30B+100%
AUG 18OCT 12
AUG 18OCT 12
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.2 vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.2·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.2 vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2·Jamba Large