Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 83/100 | 62/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.22/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.9M
140K
Completed sessions
36,024,228
3,728,863
Token share
20.7%
0.25%
Tokens
203T+100%
2.4T+100%
AUG 18OCT 12
AUG 18OCT 12
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Jamba MiniLing 3.0 Flash Fin·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Jamba LargeLing 3.0 Flash Fin·Jamba Large