Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 0/100 | 45/100 | 48/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 7/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.9M
0
Completed sessions
36,167,821
4
Token share
20.8%
0%
Tokens
203T+100%
00%
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Jamba MiniGemini 3.5 Flash Lite·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Jamba LargeGemini 3.5 Flash Lite·Jamba Large