GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

  1. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder72/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10035/10081/1000/10068/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$1.74/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$3.48/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
185K
663K
Completed sessions
1,488,760
1,452,897
Token share
0.25%
0.85%
Tokens
2.4T+100%
8.3T-76%
AUG 18OCT 12
AUG 18OCT 12
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.1%8.5K user-weeks
60.7%56K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.